ASTM G36 PDF

Presented in this report are the results of stress corrosion cracking testing per ASTM G36 (Standard Practice for Performing Stress-Corrosion Cracking Tests in a. austenitic stainless steel was studied in accordance with the ASTM G The samples were unidirectional cold-rolled up to 60 and 90 percent reduction in. Revised ASTM G36 apparatus. This client had been testing stress corrosion- cracking in metal welds by clamping a QVF 2″ glass pipe fitting to his samples.

Author: Faugore Mezijas
Country: Hungary
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Video
Published (Last): 5 November 2017
Pages: 478
PDF File Size: 12.35 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.9 Mb
ISBN: 315-8-35948-423-3
Downloads: 47163
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tukasa

Test procedures conformed to the referenced ASTM test method. It asgm decided that g336 in the bare tube could be best examined using a longitudinal cross-section, while the cracks in the finned tube could be best examined using a transverse cross-section. On the finned test specimen, cracks extended down the fins from the outer edge to the tube wall in a direction roughly normal to the tube wall; at the tube wall the cracks extended in a short arc both longitudinally and circumferentially, the arcs stopping before the next fin was encountered.

The weld and HAZ of the finned tube appeared to have more cracks than the base metal, and the cracks appear to nearly connect from fin to fin. Corrosion Testing Laboratories, Inc. Quality Aatm Return to Corrosion Testing.

This leads to the possibility of confusing stress-corrosion failures with mechanical failures induced by corrosion-reduced net cross xstm.

Circumferential cracking of the bare tube test specimen was apparent within the first 8 hours of testing even while the test specimen was on test. The test may not be relevant to stress-corrosion cracking in polythionic acid or caustic environments.

ASTM G36 – 94(2013)

Photographs of typical appearance of the cracks on both tubes are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Return to Corrosion Testing. The test specimens were immersed in the aetm solution and supported using the suggested ladder-back cradles. Accompanying paperwork states that both types of tube were fabricated from the same heat lot of material. A suggested test apparatus capable of maintaining solution concentration and temperature within the prescribed limits for extended periods of time is also described herein.

  HANDFUL OF KEYS FATS WALLER PDF

Active view current version of standard. Crack characteristics were investigated by preparing metallographic sections of the test specimens.

G2MT Laboratories

However, such correlations may not always be possible. Newark, Delaware USA Deepest crack found on longitudinal cross-section of bare tube. It is asrm responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

No preparation other than deburring and degreasing was performed on the test specimens prior to testing. Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.

Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard. It is a method for detecting the effects of composition, heat treatment, surface finish, microstructure, and stress on the b36 of these materials to chloride stress corrosion aztm. Cracking of both test specimens was observed, and the tests were terminated.

Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard. Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard.

CTL-ASTM G36 – STRESS CORROSION CRACKING in a BOILING MAGNESIUM CHLORIDE SOLUTION

Link to Active This link asmt always route to the current Active version of the standard. Two 2 1-foot long pieces of 0. Both test specimens were taken off test at 8 hours for examination at low magnification. Although this test may be performed using various concentrations of magnesium chloride, this procedure covers a test solution held at a constant boiling temperature of See Section 7 for specific safety precautions.

  5W2H ANALYSIS PDF

See Section 7 for specific safety precautions.

The ast points of aqueous magnesium chloride solutions at one atmosphere pressure as a function of concentration are shown graphically in Fig. Regular examination periods for test specimen cracking were scheduled.

The boiling points of aqueous magnesium chloride solutions at one atmosphere pressure as a function of concentration are shown graphically in Fig.

Although this test may be performed using various concentrations of magnesium chloride, this procedure covers a test solution held at a constant boiling temperature of This danger is particularly great when small cross section samples, high applied stress levels, long exposure periods, stress-corrosion resistant alloys, or a combination thereof are being used. Materials that normally provide acceptable resistance in hot chloride service may crack in this test.

Revised ASTM G36 apparatus

Careful examination is recommended for correct diagnosis of the cause of failure. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Deepest cracks found on transverse cross-section of finned tube. Black lines indicate the approximate location of the outer surface of the tube.

Etching both sections did not reveal any additional crack depth as sometimes occurs in metallographic studies of f36 cracking. It is a method for detecting the effects of composition, heat treatment, surface finish, microstructure, and stress on the susceptibility of these materials to chloride stress corrosion cracking.

Circumferential cracks with connecting longitudinal crack in base metal of bare tube. Microphotographs of the deepest cracks found on the mounted sections are shown in Figures 3 and 4.