ISO 15504-2 PDF

ISO/IEC. First edition. Software engineering — Process assessment —. Part 2: Performing an assessment. Génie logiciel — Procédés. PDF | The customization of software process capability/maturity models ( SPCMMs) to specific domains/sectors or development methodologies represents one of. Download scientific diagram | Capability dimensions of ISO/IEC from publication: The Application of International Software Engineering Standards in.

Author: Goltizilkree Feran
Country: France
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 4 December 2007
Pages: 238
PDF File Size: 5.55 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.35 Mb
ISBN: 537-2-44975-669-8
Downloads: 87511
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Yozilkree

Computer programming Requirements engineering Software deployment Software design Software maintenance Software testing Systems analysis Formal methods. The rating is based upon evidence collected against the practice indicators, which demonstrate fulfillment of the process attribute.

The process assessment model in part 6 is based on the process reference model for systems: This has been for several reasons:. There are a limited number of computer based tools that present the indicators and allow users to enter the assessment judgment and notes in formatted screens, as well as automate the collated assessment result i.

This was expanded to cover all related processes in a software business, for example project managementconfiguration managementquality assuranceand so on. This was proposed from Japan when the TRs were published at The international standard defines nine process attributes:.

Views Read Edit View history. The capability of processes is measured using process attributes. The initial International Standard was recreated in 5 parts. The specific problem is: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. SPICE is still used for the user group of the 15504–2, and the title for the annual conference.

ISO/IEC – Wikipedia

In addition there are methods available that adapt its use to various contexts. In a few cases, there may be feedback requiring further assessment before a final process rating is made.

There exist several assessment tools. The first versions of the standard focused exclusively on software development processes. Process rating requires some exercising of expert judgment on the ieo of the assessor and this is the reason that there are requirements on assessor qualifications and competency. The list of processes covered grew to cover six business areas: This also enables suppliers to identify gaps between their current capability and the level required by a potential customer, and to undertake improvement to achieve the contract requirements i.


Following this improvement programme is not mandatory and several alternative improvement programmes exist. This section’s factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information.

ISO/IEC 15504

This is an elaboration of the process reference model Izo provided by the process lifecycle standards. The organization can determine a target capability for suppliers, based on the organization’s needs, and then assess suppliers against a set of target process profiles that specify this target 15504. The process assessment model PAM is the detailed model used for an actual assessment.

The issued standard now specifies the measurement framework and can use different process reference models. An 1554-2 can collect data on a process by various means, including interviews with persons performing the process, collecting documents and quality records, and collecting statistical process data. The assessor assesses this data using his expert judgment against a process’s base practices and io capability dimension’s generic practices in the process rating step.

This page was last edited on 12 Juneat Each process attribute consists of one or more generic practices, which are further elaborated into practice indicators to aid assessment performance.

Target process profiles are particularly important in contexts where the organization for example, a government department is required to accept the cheapest qualifying vendor. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. The reference model defines a process dimension and a capability dimension.

The simplest comprise paper-based tools. The process rating is then presented as a preliminary finding to the sponsor and preferably also to the persons assessed to ensure that they agree that the assessment is accurate. This article may require 155042- to meet Wikipedia’s quality standards. The 7th part is currently in an advanced Final Draft 51504-2 form [3] and work has started on part 8. It specifies requirements for improvement programmes and provides guidance on planning and executing improvements, including a description of an eight step improvement programme.


One of the requirements is to use a conformant assessment method for the assessment process. ISO provides a standard for assessing the organization’s capacity to deliver at each of these stages. List of International Electrotechnical Commission standards. Work on extending isl value of capability determination includes a method called Practical Process Profiles – which uses risk as the determining factor in setting target process profiles.

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Safety extension van Loon, H. For a successful assessment, the assessor must have a suitable level of the relevant skills and experience. Retrieved from ” https: Data modeling Enterprise architecture Functional specification Modeling language Orthogonality Programming paradigm Software Software archaeology Software architecture Software configuration management Software development methodology Software development process Software quality Software quality assurance Software verification and validation Structured analysis.

There are five general and industry models in use. Computer science Computer engineering Project management Risk management Systems engineering. The actual method is not specified in the standard although the standard places requirements on the method, method developers and assessors using the method.